Compliance with and without Construction Cameras: A Cost Comparison

Construction Compliance

Compliance is one of the biggest cost centers for construction firms. Tracking and understanding an ever-increasing list of regulations from OSHA and other governing bodies takes substantial time and resources. 

And for many firms, it’s mostly a manual process. Paper-based documentation and logs take time to create, and often contain errors, which can force firms to do additional work to satisfy the requirements of audits and investigations. These occur frequently — last year, OSHA conducted more than 33,000 inspections to address all kinds of violations — from falls to chemical exposure and other hazards. 

To make matters worse, OSHA fines increased in January this year. The maximum penalty for “Willful” or “Repeated” violations went up $2,000 to $134,937. Other more minor violations increased, as well, with maximums set at $13,494 per incident. 

How do you mitigate the high cost of compliance? Construction cameras may be the answer.

It’s Hard to Dispute Visual Evidence

Most firms pay an employee to manually document adherence to regulatory requirements. But the reality is that those paper-based records will contain errors and omissions, and the time and effort spent desperately searching for that missing information in the midst of a compliance audit could create significant additional overheard. What’s more, those efforts may not be fruitful, and fines could still be levied against your firm.

Construction cameras help to reduce the effort and cost of compliance by eliminating much of the manual logging and note-taking typical of compliance activities. Video footage and photos provide visual proof that workers are following policies and procedures, and that necessary precautions are being consistently implemented on your jobsite. 

Advanced camera solutions such as TrueLook automatically upload and store all video evidence in the cloud and provide features such as time-stamping for fast and easy retrieval. Users can quickly search for a photo or video clip by date to help auditors and inspectors find what they need, instead of sifting through hand-written notes in paper files.

Another thing to consider is that having cameras on the jobsite helps to enforce policies and procedures. Research has shown time and time again that when workers know they’re being watched, they’re more productive and more likely to follow the rules. In this way, cameras minimize the chances of non-compliance, reducing your risk of incurring fines. 

So, What’s the ROI?

The average cost of construction cameras range from $2,000 to $7,000, with lower-resolution, fixed-position cameras on the lower end and high-res and PTZ cameras at the higher end. Monthly service fees range from $225-400 per month, per camera. Say you have two camera systems on your jobsite and the project lasts for 10 months. You’re looking at between $4,000 and 14,000 for the hardware and between $2,250 and $4,000 for the services. A total investment of between $6,250 and $18,000. And keep in mind, once you buy the cameras, you can reuse them on subsequent jobs, then only paying the monthly service fee.

But if that price seems like a lot, consider the cost of not having the appropriate documentation and visual evidence when needed. Again, maximum penalties are ranging between $13,494 and $134,937…per offense.

Without visual proof of compliance, it would be more difficult to dispute what an inspector perceived to be a “willful violation,” which could cost up to a whopping $134,937, assuming they only identify one. With cameras on-site, not only is it much less likely workers or subcontractors would willfully violate a regulation in the first place, but you would also have visual evidence to back up your claim.

In addition to the cost of fines, cameras can help reduce man hours needed to document and then subsequently retrieve information, if needed. If you pay an employee $30 per hour, and they spend 10 hours per week on the task, over the course of the project this cost really starts to add up.

Value Beyond Compliance 

Clearly, the cost of compliance can exceed the cost of implementing construction cameras — but there’s more to the story. Cameras help jobs stay on-track and on-budget, providing tremendous cost-savings throughout the project lifecycle and additional lasting value. 

In addition to reducing compliance costs and non-compliance risk, construction cameras enhance jobsite security, improve collaboration, and reduce the need for travel. TrueLook’s solutions integrate seamlessly with Procore, Autodesk and other project management software, so you can easily share, store and edit photos and videos with remote stakeholders. This enables you to address issues more rapidly, and helps keep remote stakeholders in the loop for faster decision-making. As a bonus, you gain access to a trove of visual media your team can repurpose for marketing and promotional activities. And, you can reuse cameras at subsequent jobsites, getting more value from your initial investment.

Allison Shaub, Chief Marketing Officer headhsot

Allison Shaub, Chief Marketing Officer

Allison is a seasoned marketing leader with over 14 years of experience driving transformative change for startups, agencies, and Fortune 100/500 companies. With expertise across diverse B2B and B2C markets, including technology, construction, automotive, and healthcare, she's known for her customer-centric approach that consistently delivers higher ROI and exceptional product development. At TrueLook, Allison spearheads strategic marketing initiatives to enhance brand awareness, meet business objectives, and foster deeper consumer engagement. Beyond work, Allison loves spending time with her husband, son, and two fur kids.

See All Posts